Death-sentence to devilish criminal like Yakub Memon should never have a shadow of doubt and hesitation.

The name Yakub Memon can never escape our memories, for it is gravely engraved there. How even can our memory get rid of this man whose involvement in 1993 Bombay Bombings case culminated in more than 257 deaths? Never, perhaps.

blast mumbai 1993 Is Impending Noose Around Yakub Memon’s Neck A Miscarriage Of Justice?

Yakub is the brother of none other than Ibrahim ‘Tiger’ Memon who tailored out the fool-proof plot of 1993 Bombay Bombings. Despite Ibrahim’s forewarning, Yakub surrendered himself to Indian government for the sake of his family ‘Memon’s’ reputation which was at stake then. Not only did he succumb himself to Indian government but also divulged out Pakistan’s upholding in bombings. He might have done these, anticipating clemency from Indian government. He, under TADA was served a penalty of life-imprisonment but the year 2013 was the call for his death-sentence by the Supreme Court. Thereafter, he has made 24 mercy pleas to deal with rejections one after another.

Well, the crux of this entire piece of writing is to opine whether the penalty of death-sentence a fair or unfair upshot.

Yakub Is Impending Noose Around Yakub Memon’s Neck A Miscarriage Of Justice?

Few key-points that arise on taking a 360 degree observation around this entire affair

1.       On the grounds of religion

Shall we take India’s communal status into account while deciding the punishment for such heinous crime? Buzz about this case is that the decision will have, in a negative way, a great impact on Indian Muslims. For his religion has entitled him to such punishment, because there exist several convicts of Godhra riots who passed scot-free. Then why noose around Yakub is in-the-air debate.

To wind up this religion-circumvented point, I would simply ask one question, that is, can religion be a parameter when it comes to the justice of those colossal 257 deaths? Not even a moron would bring in such gibberish considerations to kill that one who has taken away 257 lives.


2.       On the grounds of substantial revelation

Just because he spilled the beans that Pakistan too played an aiding role in carrying out such horrendous crime, he simply can’t carpet his gigantic crime with a tad of good. For, self-realization and guilt can’t give back life to the lives lost. No forgiveness is above justice.

3.       On the grounds of capital punishment

One may tongue-war that his death can’t re-liven up those 257 innocents and so court need not penalize with him a death-sentence. And neither can his death uproot the deep-seated terrorism from India. Then why hang him to death? Great ones have introduced phrases “an eye for an eye”, “as you sow, you shall reap” and many such-likes to perhaps un-riddle such riddles. Hands of law should be more powerful than the greatness of heart when it comes to such ghastly acts.

‘Life’ in spiritual context holds in a great sacredness. So, when sacredness was being tarnished in those 257 deaths, why not tarnish again?

Mistakes have reprieves and not crimes. Perhaps that’s the reason why mistakes and crimes are the two different entities of dictionary. In fact, since last 25 years, India was oblivious of this huge difference which cause delay to his death that actually should have befallen on him 22 years back itself.


By Prerna Daga

Image Source: 12

Custom Search

Do you have any contrary opinion to this post - Do you wish to get heard - You can now directly publish your opinion - or link to another article with a different view at our blogs. We will likely republish your opinion or blog piece at IndiaOpines with full credits